Kamala Harris

Donald Trump has posted a parody video mocking Kamala Harris following his viral chat with former president Barack Obama.

Before the President-elect took to Truth Social to troll the current Vice President, social media users were quick to bash her for her “salty” reaction after spotting the duo laughing at former president Jimmy Carter’s funeral, Knewz.com can report.

Just days after Trump and Obama’s friendly chat went viral, the president-elect used the opportunity to mock his former opponent in the 2024 presidential election.

The fake audio started with Trump: “Barack, very nice to see you.”

Obama responded: “Congratulations, so how are you doing?”

Trump replied: “A lot better now.”

Obama’s audio said: “I knew you’d win.”

Trump’s fake voice replied: “Oh really? Come on. Anyone could beat her.”

In the parody clip, Trump also snubbed Hillary Clinton, whom he beat during the 2016 presidential election.

Trump’s audio said: “You know what I realized, Hillary still hates me.”

Shortly after cameras caught Obama and Trump – who are very vocal about their hatred for one another – laughing and talking before the funeral began, social media users were quick to call out the Vice President for appearing “jealous” and “bitter.”

On Thursday, January 9, former presidents, politicians, family, and friends gathered at the Washington National Cathedral in Washington, D.C., for Carter’s funeral.

The 39th President of the United States died on December 29 at 100 years old.

At the service, President-elect Trump and former President Obama were seated next to each other.

One user said on X: “Obama is acting quite friendly to someone he usually pretends to despise. It’s almost like Trump isn’t really that bad. Imagine that.”

Another wrote: “Obama & Trump chatting it up like old buddies.”

A third added: “I really want to hear what President Trump said to Obama to make him laugh at a funeral.”

Social media also noticed how Harris seemed “irritated” to see the two laughing and sitting together.

One user wrote: “Kamala Harris seems to be giving dirty looks as Obama and Trump schmooze at Carter’s funeral.”

Another said: “Kamala Harris appears irritated as she turns around to look at Obama and Trump having a conversation.”

A fourth penned: “Vice President Kamala Harris is visibly FURIOUS as the man who beat her in the 2024 election, President-elect Donald Trump, is having a blast talking to former President Barack Obama! Some wounds never completely heal!”

In addition, many users said the moment Harris saw the duo chatting was “absolutely priceless.”

Just days before Harris came face-to-face with Trump, she had to take another public and embarrassing loss.

Last Monday, she presided over a joint session of Congress certifying the results of the 2024 presidential election, which Trump won by a landslide.

Inside details from the autopsy of Robert F. Kennedy could unveil the chilling truth behind the U.S. senator‘s violent death.

A new biography on Dr. Thomas Noguchi reveals the Hollywood coroner discovered definitive forensic evidence suggesting a second gunman was behind Kennedy’s 1968 assassination – despite his family’s initial request to take custody of his body and halt any further tests, Knewz.com can reveal.

In her bombshell new book, author Anne Soon Choi uncovers the decades-old conspiracy surrounding the true culprit behind Kennedy’s devastating death – told through the perspective of the man who saw his body moments after the assassination.

For years, it has been reported that Kennedy was shot by Sirhan Sirhan at the Ambassador Hotel in Los Angeles, California on June 5, 1968.

The politician was declared dead at the age of 42 the next day.

Immediately after the shooting, a power struggle between Dr. Noguchi and the Secret Service led to a flawed autopsy of Kennedy, with key details misreported and the body improperly handled.

Learning from this, Dr. Noguchi knew he had to maintain control over RFK’s case to avoid similar issues and conspiracy theories – though at that moment, the senator was still alive and being treated at Good Samaritan Hospital.

Dr. Noguchi immediately insisted on examining the crime scene at the Ambassador Hotel, accompanied by the LAPD, where he noted specific blood splatters and bullet holes.

Choi wrote: “He wanted to be involved every step of the way. With the LAPD in tow, Noguchi began his survey of the kitchen where the senator had been gunned down.

“He made note of the blood splatter patterns in the enclosed space and the bullet holes in the walls. He made sure that the crime scene was processed in a way that the collection of evidence could not be disputed. It was now a waiting game; he headed to his office.”

After Kennedy was later declared dead at 1:44 a.m. on June 6, Choi detailed his family’s initial request to take custody of his body – and how Dr. Noguchi had to convince them an autopsy needed to be conducted.

She wrote: “The senator had not been dead for an hour before the family demanded custody of the body. But Noguchi had jurisdiction, and he and his staff, who had prepped an autopsy room in the basement morgue of the hospital, first X-rayed the Senator’s body.

“With the AFIP physicians en route, he needed to convince the family to let the autopsy move forward. They initially opposed it because the cause of death was crystal clear; Kennedy had died of a gunshot wound to the head.”

Choi added: “But Noguchi continued to make his case until a deputy district attorney pointed out that a crime had been committed and the autopsy findings would be needed to bring Sirhan Sirhan, who was apprehended at the scene, to justice.

“There was silence. Noguchi turned to Kennedy’s widow, Ethel, who was four months pregnant and looked drawn with grief and exhaustion, and murmured, ‘Trust me.’

“The Kennedy family acquiesced, and Noguchi and his staff got to work. The clock was ticking.”

Dr. Noguchi identified two key wounds on Kennedy’s body: the first, a “through-and-through” gunshot to the right armpit, and a second bullet that traveled through his back and lodged in his spine. He collected the bullet as evidence.

The fatal wound, which entered Kennedy’s skull near his ear, shattered on impact, making it difficult to trace the weapon.

Choi noted how being unable to “definitively match the weapon” meant that “additional evidence would be needed to establish Sirhan as the killer.”

To gather more evidence, Dr. Noguchi found gunshot residue on Kennedy’s suit and had his team redress the body to reconstruct the senator’s position when he was shot.

Later that week, an LAPD criminalist told Dr. Noguchi that gunpowder residue and soot had been found in Kennedy’s hair – confirming his suspicion about the proximity of the shot.

The presence of soot indicated the gun had been fired inches from the senator’s head, contradicting witness statements that placed Sirhan at least three feet away.

The chief coroner conducted his own ballistics tests using pig ears and muslin skulls at the Police Academy range, simulating various distances for gunshots.

He found that a shot fired from three inches away matched the entrance wound and explained the soot in Kennedy’s hair.

This further raised doubts about Sirhan’s guilt, as no witnesses saw him fire at point-blank range.

Additionally, twelve bullet tracks were found at the scene, but Sirhan’s gun only held eight rounds, hinting at a possible second gunman – a theory that persists, despite arguments that some bullets may have ricocheted in the cramped space.

Despite eyewitnesses claiming Sirhan shot Kennedy from the front, Choi said Dr. Noguchi’s forensic evidence showed all three bullets entered from the back.

He explained how Kennedy was likely turning when shot, which could explain discrepancies in witness accounts of Sirhan’s distance. Dr. Noguchi also noted the witnesses, focused on Kennedy, might not have seen Sirhan clearly, especially as he moved.

Dr. Noguchi’s ambiguity ultimately tied him to the conspiracy theory surrounding a second gunman for years.

Choi explained: “Noguchi never said, ‘Sirhan Sirhan killed Robert Kennedy’, which left open the possibility of a second gunman.

“Little did the coroner know at the time that this fact would tie him to the conspiracy theories and the accompanying publicity for years to come.”

Later facing reporters, Dr. Noguchi stated Kennedy’s brain wound was so severe that even if he had survived, he would have been a “mental and physical cripple”.

While Choi said Dr. Noguchi refrained from speculation, his “perfect autopsy” of Kennedy unquestionably set a new standard in forensic science and propelled him to national prominence.

Failed presidential aspirant Kamala Harris apparently displayed an arrogant attitude to Teamster’s president Sean O’Brien, warning that she would win the election with or without the union’s help, Knewz.com has learned.

We all know how that turned out for her.

For the first time in 30 years, the Teamster’s union did not endorse a candidate in this year’s election. Harris’ alleged attitude likely didn’t win her any favors from the union leader.

O’Brien, who was a guest on The Tucker Carlson Show, told the host about a meeting he had with the vice president in July shortly after President Biden withdrew from the race.

According to O’Brien, an angry Harris lashed out at the Teamsters during a roundtable discussion in which she only answered three of 16 planned questions.

He told Carlson Harris demanded: “Teamsters? You better get on board. Better get on board soon.”

She then cut the roundtable abruptly short, leaving 20 minutes early. But on her way out, she made O’Brien one more promise.

O’Brien recalled she told him: “I’m going to win with you or without you!” He added his reaction was one of shock: “Who does this f—— lady think she is?”

Carlson was equally stunned, replying: “D—. I thought I was arrogant. That’s really arrogant.”

In the final days before the election, O’Brien announced that for the first time since 1996 the Teamsters would not be endorsing a presidential candidate.

The Teamsters backed the Biden-Harris ticket in 2020 and endorsed Hillary Clinton over Donald Trump in 2016.

Harris’ campaign dropped a massive amount of money on celebrity influencers, radical activist groups, and private jets in her failed bid for the White House. And she wants that money back.

Over a week after the election wrapped, the campaign was still seeking more donations via email and text.

One of the text messages begged: “Hi Team, It’s Kamala, The election isn’t what we wanted, but I will never give up the fight.

“And right now there are still a number of critical races across the country that are either too close to call, or within the margin of recounts or certain legal challenges.”

According to two campaign officials, the donation requests were meant for the Democratic National Committee to help assist with state recounts or curing ballots.

Many campaign officials have questioned the request for donations and suggested the money could allegedly go towards paying off the massive debt.

A senior campaign official called it “appalling,” while another said it was “disgusting.”

Harris soon discovered the only thing voters were willing to donate was their frustration. Users took to X to mock Harris for the request.

One user wrote: “Are you kidding me? Kamala Harris is asking for donations to fund a recount. Seriously?”

Another claimed: “Harris is sending me emails to help pay off her huge balance for her failed election. They are looking for funds to pay off their debts to the celebrities who sold their souls to perform for her.”

A third user alleged: “Kamala Harris wants a vote RECOUNT. What’s even more hilarious is that she’s asking for CAMPAIGN DONATIONS to do it. Could it be that she’s just bamboozling her supporters to try to pay for the $20 million in debt she ran up??!”

MSNBC employees have been expressing outrage over the recently revealed donations made by the Kamala Harris campaign to Al Sharpton’s nonprofit organization shortly before the former Democratic Presidential nominee sat down for an interview with the MSNBC host.

Knewz.com has learned that the Harris campaign had made two significant donations to Sharpton’s nonprofit “National Action Network” prior to the “favorable” interview ahead of the 2024 elections.

The Vice President’s election campaign made a $250,000 contribution to the nonprofit on September 5, and another one for the same amount on October 1—a few weeks before Sharpton interviewed Harris.

According to an MSNBC spokesperson, Sharpton did not disclose the big-dollar donations to the viewers or the top brass of the network.

Weeks later, on October 20, Sharpton’s interview of Harris saw the MSNBC host tout the Vice President’s campaign as “extraordinarily historic,” and invoked Shirley Chisholm, the first black woman elected to Congress, to put Harris’s campaign “in historical perspective,” according to reports.

“[Sharpton’s] questions lined up closely with messages that Harris sought to highlight on the campaign trail. Sharpton addressed concerns among black voters—especially black men—about Harris’s record as a prosecutor in California, where she was given the nickname ‘Kamala the Cop,'” reports have pointed out.

Sharpton also asked Harris whether the men who opposed her were “misogynistic.”

While Sharpton seemingly held Harris’s candidacy in high esteem, he referred to Republican Presidential candidate Donald Trump as “hostile and erratic,” per reports.

It is worth noting that The Washington Free Beacon reported that the donation Sharpton accepted, and the nature of the Harris interview, “clearly constitute participation in a political campaign” and “violate basic journalistic ethics guidelines regarding financial relationships with sources or interview subjects.”

The Society of Professional Journalists said in a statement to the outlet regarding the matter:

“This kind of entanglement harms the credibility of the journalist, the news organization, and journalism overall, and credibility is difficult to restore… While Sharpton may not consider himself a journalist, many viewers do.”

“When TV news broadcasters do not report their conflicts of interest, or conduct their work in ways that run counter to ethical journalism, it builds distrust among their audiences and places a black eye on both their network and the profession,” the statement further read.

On October 3, days after receiving a total of $500,000 in donations from the Harris campaign, Sharpton shared a video of the Vice President wishing him a happy birthday on the MSNBC weekend show PoliticsNation with Al Sharpton.

While MSNBC has previously held hosts accountable for similar violations, the network has yet to reveal what it has decided to do in Sharpton’s case.

According to reports, MSNBC president Phil Griffin suspended hosts Joe Scarborough and Keith Olbermann in 2010 for making political donations. The MSNBC policy regarding the matter stated at the time:

“Anyone working for NBC News who takes part in civic or other outside activities may find that these activities jeopardize his or her standing as an impartial journalist because they may create the appearance of a conflict of interest.”

“Such activities may include participation in or contributions to political campaigns or groups that espouse controversial positions. You should report any such potential conflicts in advance to, and obtain prior approval of, the president of NBC News or his designee,” the policy further stated.

It is unknown whether the network’s policy has changed since then.

However, according to reports, Sharpton’s colleagues are seemingly unhappy about the clandestine donations—which were only revealed in the Federal Election Commission filings following Harris’s defeat in the 2024 Presidential race.

A current MSNBC employee said in a statement to Fox News Digital, “No one’s surprised that anybody at MSNBC was rooting for Harris. This feels like another level of nonsense. Like, you’re kidding me, right? This is weird.”

“Harris could have given Al Sharpton an interview, and it would have gone the same way… But what are you paying for?… There’s no way that this can’t seem weird,” the employee added.

The MSNBC staffer further stated that it is common knowledge that Sharpton is given a “wide berth” and “not held to the same journalistic standard” as the others at the network. However, the insider feels like the controversy still smells like a “pay-to-play” scheme.

The employee commented in this regard:

“This has a bit of a dirty feel to it… These things happen and they don’t bounce around MSNBC all that much. Like people just don’t care… This one feels, I’d say, there’s a deeper disappointment. There’s a sense of like, ‘Ugh, we don’t need this. This feels kind of grifty and gross.'”

“There is a sense among the people I’ve spoken to that this feels like something wrong and that something should be done about it… I don’t know what that something is… That’s a lot of money! That’s not a small matter… It just doesn’t sit well with people,” they further said.

Kamala Harris‘s campaign coughed up more than double the expected amount to Oprah Winfrey‘s company for a live-streamed event during this year’s presidential race.

Two sources disclosed that Harris paid Winfrey Harpo Productions nearly $2.5 million for the “United for America” event in September, contrary to earlier reports claiming it only cost the Democratic candidate $1 million, Knewz.com can reveal.

Harris’ campaign burned through $100 million per week during her brief presidential bid, which kicked off in late July following Joe Biden‘s retraction from the race.

Supporters are also still being hit with donation pleas after her almost $1.8 billion campaign left the Democratic Party $20 million in debt.

The extravagant spending has sparked growing concerns about the Democratic campaign, especially after their crushing loss to Republican Donald Trump – who beat Harris with 312 Electoral College votes.

Much of Harris’ spending came from influencer partnerships, celebrity performances at her events, and private jet travel between battleground states.

FEC filings revealed the campaign spent $20 million – nearly the same amount as its reported debt – on concerts and celeb appearances in the final days leading up to the election.

One of the higher bills was for Winfrey, who received roughly $2.5 million for her production firm hosting a town hall with Harris in September, according to a new report from The New York Times.

The event – which got over 1.2 million views in under 12 hours – featured the TV personality interviewing the Democratic candidate on topics such as immigration and abortion rights.

According to a spokesperson for Harpo Productions, the campaign “paid for the production costs of ‘Unite for America,’ a live streaming event that took place September 19 outside Detroit, Michigan.”

They added: “Oprah Winfrey was at no point during the campaign paid a personal fee, nor did she receive a fee from Harpo.”

The virtual town hall was also promoted as a celebrity event with appearances from figures like Meryl Streep, Chris Rock, Ben Stiller, and Julia Roberts.

The talk show host insisted she didn’t keep any of the funds, but instead paid her team and covered the costs required for the event.

Winfrey wrote in an Instagram comment: “I was not paid a dime.”

“For the livestreaming event in September, my production company, Harpo, was asked to bring in set design, lights, cameras, crew, producers and every other item necessary (including the benches and the chairs we sat on) to put on a live production.

“I did not take any personal fee. However, the people who worked on that production needed to be paid. And were. End of story.”

Along with Winfrey, millions of dollars were also spent on celebrities such as Beyoncé, Christina Aguilera, Megan Thee Stallion, Bon Jovi, Lady Gaga, Bruce Springsteen, and Katy Perry.

Since Harris’ costly defeat, the impact of celebrity endorsements and performances has been called into question – especially as Trump spent less on his campaign.

The Democratic campaign and pro-Democratic outside groups spent almost $1.8 billion in total, while the Trump campaign and outside groups spent $1.4 billion.

As Presidential hopeful Kamala Harris is left to lick the wounds of her election defeat, Democrats have begun to blame certain campaign decisions for the loss—including her selection of the “wrong” running mate.

Knewz.com has learned that many Democratic supporters and officials have blamed Harris’s decision to choose Minnesota Governor Tim Walz as the Vice Presidential nominee for her failed Presidential bid.

It has been pointed out that the “leading alternative” to Walz – who contested the elections amidst stolen valor accusations – was the “charismatic and popular” Pennsylvania Governor Josh Shapiro.

Given Pennsylvania’s importance as a swing state, Democrats wonder whether choosing the state’s governor as the Democratic vice presidential nominee could have made a difference in the elections, which saw Harris lose in all seven battleground states.

Pennsylvania-based senior Democratic official Lindy Li believes that choosing Shapiro as her running mate would have not only made an impact in Pennsylvania but could have also been beneficial for the Harris campaign as a whole.

“People are wondering tonight what would have happened had Shapiro been on the ticket. And not only in terms of Pennsylvania,” Li said in a statement to Fox News.

She explained that choosing Shapiro, a moderate, as her running mate would have “signaled to the American people that she is not the San Francisco liberal that Trump said she was.”

“But she went with someone actually to her Left… In the eyes of the American people, Walz was the governor who oversaw the protests,” Li added.

Donald Trump won Pennsylvania with 50.5% votes—commanding a two-point lead over Harris, per the data released by The Associated Press.

It is worth noting that much like in 2016, Trump once again breached the “blue wall” on November 5, effectively flipping several swing states over to his side.

Georgia, North Carolina, Wisconsin, Michigan, and Pennsylvania all voted Democrat in 2020 but showed their support for Trump this time around.

Notably, Georgia, which voted for the Democratic Presidential candidates in both 2016 and 2020, saw Trump win with a solid two-point lead in the 2024 elections, according to reports published by The New York Times.

David Schultz, an author and political science professor at Minnesota’s Hamline University, said in a statement that Biden had managed to win in the “blue wall” swing states in 2020 because of the way Trump handled the COVID-19 pandemic.

However, with the coronavirus panic having passed, Trump seems to have regained his footing in the said states.

Another reason to which experts have attributed Harris’s election defeat is the issue of policies.

Schultz pointed out that while the economy was very much a hot-button issue this election, Harris chose to focus more on the issue of abortion and related healthcare. Although abortion is an important topic, a preliminary national exit poll conducted by data provider Edison Research showed that only 14% of the voters cared about it.

In contrast, 31% of the voters participating in the Edison Research poll said they would cast their vote based on how each candidate decides to handle the economy.

Schultz commented that “economic issues along with feelings of being ignored drove the Trump victory,” adding that Democrats failed to address it sufficiently “in the three blue wall states.”

Democrats also blamed Harris’s defeat on the fact that she allegedly “failed to stake out her policy positions.” They also said that she did not distance herself from Biden – who reports say “was underwater in public approval ratings” – and his policies.

It has been pointed out in this regard that in a previous appearance on the talk show The View, the Vice President was asked what she would have done differently to Biden during the past four years, to which Harris replied, “There is not a thing that comes to mind.”

On the other hand, MSNBC commentator Joy Reid blamed “white women” for Harris’s failed Presidential bid, saying: “In the end, they didn’t make their numbers. We have to be blunt about why; black voters came through for Harris, white women voters did not.”

CNN contributor and former Barack Obama adviser Van Jones attributed Harris’s loss to “celebrity-filled rallies.”

“I don’t think people understand, working people sometimes have to choose. Am I going to go to the big, cool concert and pay for babysitting for that or am I going to figure out a way to get to the polls? I don’t like these big star-studded events.” Jones said in a statement.

Donald Trump and Kamala Harris are doing all they possibly can in order to reel in all types of voters.

The two opponents have been targeting black, Latino, and white college women during their respective campaigns to be the next President of the United States, Knewz.com can reveal.

For Democratic candidate Harris, her team has spent the last 18 months putting together a list of which television shows and podcasts voters are all about in the battleground states. The team assigned every voter in these states a “contactability score” from 0 to 100 to figure out just how difficult that person will be to reach.

As for Trump, his team has focused on what they have labeled the “target persuadables”, which consist of younger, more racially diverse people with lower incomes who usually use streaming services and social media.

The 78-year-old has made numerous appearances on those platforms in hopes of grabbing the attention of the younger vote.

Meanwhile, Harris believes it can win over white college-educated voters, mainly women, who have historically voted Republican but are disgusted by Trump.

Polling done in the battleground states found that just 3.7 percent of their voters, or about 1.2 million people, remain undecided just a day before the election goes down.

Recently, Harris appeared on numerous shows for interviews, including stops on Call Her Daddy podcast, Howard Stern’s radio show, and The View in hopes of grabbing more undecided voters.

The 60-year-old’s campaign measured who saw her on each program, and the data revealed that two-thirds of undecided voters in the battleground states had watched at least some of her interviews during the week. However, not one program reached more than one in three of those undecided voters.

Meg Schwenzfeier, the chief analytics officer for the Harris campaign explained: “They are very hard to reach — they are not watching traditional news platforms or other programming with large, mainstream audiences.

“To talk to them, we have to take a layered approach — we have to be on TV, nontraditional platforms, door-knocking, billboards, digital ads, mail — everything really.”

As for Trump, his campaign’s research found that undecided voters were about six times as likely as other battleground-state voters to be motivated by their views of Israel’s war in Gaza.

His team also found that undecided voters were less likely to be white than those in the battlegrounds overall and more likely to be Black.

James Blair, Trump’s campaign political director previously stated: “The fact that they don’t have younger Black men locked in with less than three weeks to Election Day is a big problem for them,” referring to Harris’ campaign.

He added: “Historically, that would be part of their base.”

Both opponents are in the middle of their final push before all the votes are counted.

Trump’s final stops include North Carolina and Pennsylvania, while Harris will also focus on spending her time in Pennsylvania.

Nigel Farage, British Member of Parliament and noted friend of former President Donald Trump, has stated that in the event she is elected President, Kamala Harris should “pardon” the Republican Presidential candidate in order to “dampen down” the threats of violence.

Knewz.com has learned that Trump is scheduled for a sentencing hearing in November for using campaign funds to pay “hush money” to adult film actress Stormy Daniels.

Farage’s suggestion came at a time when Washington D.C. was cowering under fears of potential election interference and civil unrest similar to the attack on the United States Capitol on January 6, 2021.

It has been reported that the U.S. capital is undergoing significant fortification as Election Day – the road to which has been marked with assassination attempts and increasingly hostile rhetoric between both major campaigns – is finally at hand.

Reports further stated that anti-climb riot fences have been erected around the White House, the U.S. Capitol, and the residence of Vice President Harris.

“Signs of caution proliferated this weekend, as the Secret Service erected new, eight-foot-high metal fences around the White House and Treasury Department complex, and adjacent parts of Lafayette Square, as well as outside the Naval Observatory grounds and Harris’s residence,” reports mentioned.

Reports added Harris’s residence “already has a wrought-iron fence and a security station at the front gate, but crews added the special fence along most of the property’s perimeter lining Massachusetts Avenue Northwest.”

The U.S. Capitol has installed “temporary bicycle-rack barriers” with signs that read “Police Line: Do Not Cross” around its perimeter, according to reports.

On the other hand, British MP Farage suggests that “pardoning” Trump if Harris takes the White House would reduce “potential tensions,” and hence, the looming threat of civil unrest by a great deal.

In an exclusive interview, Farage stated, “If [Harris] gets in on Tuesday I hope she pardons him. She could look magnanimous and it would dampen down potential tensions.”

Farage further said that if the former President does lose by a clear margin, he should accept the loss and move on rather than trying to contest the results of the election as he did in 2020—suggesting that Trump should “go and play golf at Turnberry” instead.

However, the populist Reform UK leader believes that the polls do not sufficiently indicate the elections are “decisively” in the Democratic campaign’s bag, and that 2024 might see a Trump White House.

“If it was clear and decisive then maybe it’s time [for Trump] to go and play golf at Turnberry. If it was clear and decisive. It’s all hypothetical and I still think he is going to win,” Farage said in the recent exclusive interview.

The British MP further stated that a second term of the Trump Presidency would benefit the UK while labeling President Joe Biden “an anti-British president who had no interest in even talking about [trade with Britain].”

Talking about the prospect of a Trump Presidency, Farage said:

“These are our real friends in the world and we should maximise the opportunity… There are so many issues over the years that he and I have talked about in terms of the relationship between our two countries. He really sees us as being a much more important country than our size would suggest.”

“I can promise you not just Trump but the big thinkers behind the whole Trump movement have always seen a trade deal with Britain as a desirable thing to do,” he added.

Farage also insisted that the former President is in “top form,” despite reports suggesting Trump is showing signs of “mental illness” and “cognitive decline.”

“He shambles about aimlessly, slurs his words and sometimes speaks gibberish. Always an effortless liar, now that his speeches are nothing more than a series of lies tangled in a mass inside his head, it appears he no longer even knows he’s lying,” a Las Vegas paper recently reported.

The news outlet further stated that “the nation must confront the fact that beyond his hateful character, he is crippled cognitively and showing clear signs of mental illness.”

However, Farage contested the claims in his recent interview, saying:

“You have seen more humor from him [Trump] in the last few weeks than you’ve seen in the previous nine years. He’s been in public much more like he is in private. In private, he is a storyteller, a raconteur, he is very, very funny. Laughter is never far away when you are with him and we have seen some of that.”

On the other hand, he criticized Vice President Harris’s impromptu oration skills:

“Harris without a teleprompter… hasn’t got anything to say. You see a big interview and they are all car crashes. She has zero spontaneity. She is scripted to hell. It’s the way politics has gone.”

While Farage is seemingly hopeful about a second term of Trump Presidency, he clarified that he does not subscribe to the claims that the 2020 elections unfairly declared Biden the winner—a claim Trump and his running mate J. D. Vance have been making throughout the Presidential campaign.

“I have never gone along with the stolen election narrative… Let’s hope and pray that is not an issue this time. If it [the outcome] was clear then Republicans have to accept the result,” Farage toldThe Telegraph.

Donald Trump‘s most rabid supporters are outraged over a recent string of polls showing Vice President Kamala Harris pulling ahead in states like Iowa before the U.S. Presidential election.

Knewz.com can reveal the Harris/Walz campaign has seen a rise in support after the ex-president’s former White House advisors labeled him a “fascist”.

Several Trump supporters called the recent poll “fake news”, flooding social media sites like X and TikTok with rants directed at the pollsters, Harris and news outlets for “spreading lies” and “discouraging” Republicans from voting.

One X user shared the poll in a post and wrote: “You people have no credibility left. NONE! Same night Emerson has Trump ahead by 10.5%. Trump won this state. In fact, Trump will flip Minnesota, Virginia and N.Y. before she flips Iowa.”

Another user commented: “It’s a psyop to make us feel we’re defeated. That’s why they picked a state that’s guaranteed to be red. It’s an assault to our intelligence.”

A third person claimed: “I’m from Iowa and have never seen a Harris sign anywhere. Des Moines Dems don’t control Iowa, the farmers do.”

According to the Des Moines Register/Mediacom Iowa Poll, Harris is ahead of Trump 47 percent to 44 percent among likely voters in the state – a massive swing in the VP’s favor in less than three days before Election Day.

The new poll prompted polling analyst Nate Silver to write a swift analysis, calling the poll “shocking” and saying releasing it “took guts” to release it.

On Silver’s blog, The Silver Bulletin, he wrote: “[Ann Selzer, president of Selzer & Co.] has a long history of bucking the conventional wisdom and being right.

“In a world where most pollsters have a lot of egg on their faces, she has near-oracular status.”

The Trump campaign swiftly rejected Selzer’s poll findings, calling them an “outlier” in a memo circulated hours after the poll was published.

Tony Fabrizio, Trump’s chief campaign pollster, claimed the recent Emerson College poll “far more closely” reflects Iowa likely voters.

He said: “Unlike Emerson, which transparently reports its share of partisans and the 2020 vote recall, Des Moines Register does NOT disclose the distribution of this information, even though they asked it in their survey.”

Trump critics took to X, shared Fabrizio’s memo and wrote: “This is definitely something a non-panicking campaign would put out.”

The shock poll was released days after Trump’s former chief of staff, John Kelly, called the former president “an authoritarian” who “admires people who are dictators.

Kelly added: “(H)e has said that. So he certainly falls into the general definition of fascist, for sure.”

In a recent interview, Kelly said Trump praised the loyalty of Adolf Hitler‘s generals while expressing a desire to have similar ones serve him.

He recalled asking Trump: “Surely you can’t mean Hitler’s generals? And he said, ‘Yeah, yeah, Hitler’s generals.'”

Trump’s former top-ranking military official Mark Milley, a four-star general who served as the Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, also spoke out against the ex-president, calling him “fascist to the core”.

A vulgar billboard was recently erected in Ohio showing Vice President Kamala Harris seemingly performing a lewd act—right next to a picture of former President Donald Trump with a message that suggested he was protecting Americans.

Knewz.com has learned that the inappropriate billboard that was put up next to a highway depicted the Democratic Presidential candidate on her knees and her tongue out.

The text on the picture read, “Kamala can’t talk right now… She’s at a baby shower,” seemingly making a sexual implication.

The fake and inappropriate picture of Harris was put up next to a billboard with a picture of Trump, accompanied by the message, “In reality, they’re not after me, they’re after you. I’m just in the way.”

The vulgar billboard of Harris has been up since “at least” Friday, October 25, and could be seen by westbound traffic on the Ohio 16 highway in Licking County, Newark, Ohio.

Kennedy Outdoor Advertising, the company that put up the billboard, took it down on Sunday, October 27, after the inappropriate nature of the advert was pointed out to them.

According to reports, the company initially thought that the billboard was referring to Harris as a “crybaby.”

However, within an hour of noticing the sexually suggestive nature of the advert, the company removed it.

“Once it was brought to our attention how vulgar the advertisement actually was, we immediately removed it,” said Clayton, a spokesperson for Kennedy Outdoor Advertising who refused to disclose their last name for fear of threats.

“We don’t condone anything like that, not in any way whatsoever. Whether we agree with it politically or not, we would never agree to do anything like that. That was definitely a mistake,” Clayton added.

“We don’t always look and try to analyze every detail in the design… We deal with a lot of artwork so we don’t analyze every little thing. It may only be one person looking at the artwork,” Clayton further stated, trying to explain how the billboard got approved, printed, and installed in the first place.

“If there would have been three to four people looking at this artwork, it probably would have never made it to the billboard, obviously. But if there’s one person reviewing it, they may not think anything of it or realize the sexual innuendo that the ad presented. It’s not like the ad goes through five or six people to review and approve it.”

“We’re ashamed of it… We don’t want that up on our billboards. It’s horrible,” Clayton added.

It has been reported that the billboard was paid for by Newark-based towing company RK Towing, which frequently advertises with Kennedy Outdoor Advertising.

Clayton further stated that the company had received threatening and vulgar messages over the billboard.

The Licking County Board of Elections, on the other hand, said that it had not received any calls about the billboard as of Monday, October 28, according to Director Brian Mead.

The vulgar Harris billboard came weeks after a 43-foot “anatomically accurate” naked statue of Trump mysteriously appeared alongside the Interstate 15 highway in Las Vegas.

The Trump statue saw mixed reactions from the public, with many calling it “disgusting and un-American.”

Entitled “Crooked and Obscene,” the massive Trump statue towering at a height of over 40 feet and weighing approximately 6,000 pounds was intended as an art installation that the creators aimed to take on tour throughout the United States.

The organizers of the tour explained that the “au naturel” depiction of the Republican presidential hopeful is “intentional, serving as a bold statement on transparency, vulnerability, and the public personas of political figures,” it has been reported.

The huge “art installation” graced Las Vegas with its presence for only a brief period – 48 hours – becoming one of the most interesting attractions of the state of Nevada before its abrupt disappearance.